Seven blocks that make a project easier to evaluate
Project need
Identify the facility, target users, capacity, location and the civil-protection problem the project is intended to solve.
Technical baseline
Clarify site conditions, existing rooms or land, source surveys, likely solution direction and the technical work still required before implementation.
Budget and risk
Separate known base costs from an explicit risk reserve instead of hiding uncertainty inside one unsupported headline number.
Funding structure
Show confirmed sources, planned co-financing and the remaining funding gap. Do not present uncertain funding as secured money.
Lifecycle sustainability
Keep annual maintenance and longer-term ownership costs visible so the project is not funded only for acquisition while future operating obligations remain undefined.
Implementation schedule
Connect surveys, design, approvals, procurement, manufacture or works, installation, commissioning and acceptance to a realistic target date.
Procurement readiness
Define what will actually be purchased, which technical requirements suppliers must price and how the completed result will be accepted.
Keep confirmed information separate from assumptions
ShelterMetric deliberately allows unknown fields to remain unknown. A project is easier to assess when the reviewer can distinguish confirmed site data, base costs, user-defined risk allowances, unresolved technical questions, lifecycle scenarios and funding that is not yet secured.
A practical sequence for donor or public-sector discussions
- create or update the Project Passport;
- check the source-data and funding-readiness gaps;
- structure the base budget without invented averages;
- model an explicit reserve for identified risk categories;
- separate programme, local and other confirmed funding sources and calculate the gap;
- check annual maintenance and lifecycle cost if the funder or owner needs a sustainability view;
- build a target-date timeline;
- prepare a procurement-ready technical specification.
